🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."