🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". A law could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid first step," said one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," said a leading peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could backfire". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that governments globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.